.

.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: The TRACK (the Original) new rule set

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    BOWIE MD
    Posts
    238
    Quote Originally Posted by wjdougherty View Post
    For our purposes, Roman is the USRA. He approves what is run at Mimi's...
    The thinking is that the rules belong to The TRACK, i.e. Mimi, and our Leadership (he needs no introduction!) administers them.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Charles Town, WV
    Posts
    1,257
    That's a PC answer if I ever heard one... ;-)

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Home of the 2007 USRA Nats and a pretty fast King Track
    Posts
    2,531
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtReaper01 View Post
    They are not on the list of approved chassis. Per USRA rules this is not apprpved.
    Thanks for bringing it up Art. When the new JK C21 chassis came out ($21.95) I was sure that it would be submitted and approved during the next USRA approval cycle.

    The chassis has been submitted to the USRA for approval and I see no reason that it wouldn't be approved.

    The limited number of times I've seen it race at The TRACK so far, it has not been a game changer.

    The chassis is legal for races at The TRACK.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    53
    Roman , thank you for the well thought out answer. I have three and did not want to waste time putting them together unless we could use them. Bill I am well aware who Roman is and who runs the track, thats why I dont understand your comments. By the way if you look at the last rule for each class it says see USRA DIVISION II RULES That is why I asked. Again thank you Roman.
    Last edited by DirtReaper01; 05-12-2015 at 04:32 PM.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    25
    Roman , no min. tire diameter on the rears ?

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Home of the 2007 USRA Nats and a pretty fast King Track
    Posts
    2,531
    Nope, clearance only........ .063 under the rear AND gear at start of race.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    25
    Ok , cool. by the way , I have been hearing that USRA is going to .047 clearance. Any truth to that ?

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Glen Burnie, Md
    Posts
    1,015
    Tim I believe .047 was passed at this years event. However, that doesn't mean we have to follow the clearance at The Track. :-)

    See you later!

    Tony
    OWH Slotographer

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Home of the 2007 USRA Nats and a pretty fast King Track
    Posts
    2,531
    The USRA has voted in .047 clearance on banked tracks. Not sure yet how we will handle that locally. I will do some testing in the coming weeks then make a decision. For the time being, it's .063

    rk

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Palmyra
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by RacerDeaf View Post
    FYI - we discussed 'new classes of interest' over the 10 week scale series that ended the weekend before the 1100, for this new set, and your suggestion never came up. Would you support it?
    if your allowing a s16c, a swasp is a step down same with a contender. just saying. I'm at the work bench just finished my s16c motor,working on the chassis now..

    thought i'd double check the rules

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Palmyra
    Posts
    87
    P.S. not into nascar, but I will have a dlm and GT-12 if anyones into a good race....

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •